Enter The Net

Sustainable Internet Marketing

I recently posted a status message on Facebook about needing to clean my house. One of the comments on the post pointed me to a site called FlyLady.net. FlyLady is a personal coach and resource for cleaning. Her motto is “You Can Do Anything For Fifteen Minutes.” The idea is that if you just take 15 minutes to straighten up the kitchen or clean a part of the bathroom, it will look nice and you have only spent 15 minutes doing it – not a whole day. Since I work from home, this bit of advice was immediately implemented to great success.

It got me to thinking about internet marketing and the swamped small business owner. A top complaint from the harried business owner revolves around finding the time to maintain a robust marketing presence. But what could you do to help get more traffic to your website in 15 minute blocks?

  • You can go to a blog about your industry and leave a comment. The link back to your site will help you on the search engines. If you do not yet have a quality list of blogs related to your industry, spend your 15 minutes searching for them and saving them to your “favorites.”
  • You can invite 5 new people to be friends on Facebook or LinkedIn.
  • You can look for 5 new people or businesses to follow in Twitter (most of them will turn around and follow you right back.)
  • You could write a quick entry on your blog .

Now, any one of these activities could easily distract you and take you beyond your 15 minute limit. That’s not good. But, if I can limit myself to 15 minutes of cleaning, you can do this! The end result of these small bursts of effort is that your internet marketing presence will be dynamic and growing.

This short article was originally featured in the Clackamas Small Business Development Center email newsletter.

fb-virusBy BRAD STONE
Published: December 13, 2009

SAN FRANCISCO — It used to be that computer viruses attacked only your hard drive. Now they attack your dignity.

Malicious programs are rampaging through Web sites like Facebook and Twitter, spreading themselves by taking over people’s accounts and sending out messages to all of their friends and followers. The result is that people are inadvertently telling their co-workers and loved ones how to raise their I.Q.’s or make money instantly, or urging them to watch an awesome new video in which they star.

“I wonder what people are thinking of me right now?” said Matt Marquess, an employee at a public relations firm in San Francisco whose Twitter account was recently hijacked, showering his followers with messages that appeared to offer a $500 gift card to Victoria’s Secret.

Mr. Marquess was clueless about the offers until a professional acquaintance asked him about them via e-mail. Confused, he logged in to his account and noticed he had been promoting lingerie for five days.

“No one had said anything to me,” he said. “I thought, how long have I been Twittering about underwear?”

The humiliation sown by these attacks is just collateral damage. In most cases, the perpetrators are hoping to profit from the referral fees they get for directing people to sketchy e-commerce sites.

In other words, even the crooks are on social networks now — because millions of tightly connected potential victims are just waiting for them there.

Often the victims lose control of their accounts after clicking on a link “sent” by a friend. In other cases, the bad guys apparently scan for accounts with easily guessable passwords. (Mr. Marquess gamely concedes that his password at the time was “abc123.”)

After discovering their accounts have been seized, victims typically renounce the unauthorized messages publicly, apologizing for inadvertently bombarding their friends. These messages — one might call them Tweets of shame — convey a distinct mix of guilt, regret and embarrassment.

“I have been hacked; taking evasive maneuvers. Much apology, my friends,” wrote Rocky Barbanica, a producer for Rackspace Hosting, an Internet storage firm, in one such note.

Mr. Barbanica sent that out last month after realizing he had sent messages to 250 Twitter followers with a link and the sentence, “Are you in this picture?” If they clicked, their Twitter accounts were similarly commandeered.

“I took it personally, which I shouldn’t have, but that’s the natural feeling. It’s insulting,” he said.

Earlier malicious programs could also cause a similar measure of embarrassment if they spread themselves through a person’s e-mail address book.

But those messages, traveling from computer to computer, were more likely to be stopped by antivirus or firewall software. On the Web, such measures offer little protection. (Although they are popularly referred to as viruses or worms, the new forms of Web-based malicious programs do not technically fall into those categories, as they are not self-contained programs.)

Getting tangled up in a virus on a social network is also more painfully, and instantaneously, public. “Once it’s delivered to everyone in three seconds, the cat is out of the bag,” said Chet Wisniewski of Sophos, a Web security firm. “When people got viruses on their computers, or fell for scams at home, they were generally the only ones that knew about it and they cleaned it up themselves. It wasn’t broadcast to the whole world.”

Social networks have become prime targets of such programs’ creators for good reason, security experts say. People implicitly trust the messages they receive from friends, and are inclined to overlook the fact that, say, their cousin from Ohio is extremely unlikely to have caught them on a hidden webcam.

Sophos says that 21 percent of Web users report that they have been a target of malicious programs on social networks. Kaspersky Labs, a Russian security firm, says that on some days, one in 500 links on Twitter point to bad sites that can infect an inadequately protected computer with typical viruses that jam hard drives. Kaspersky says many more links are purely spam, frequently leading to dating sites that pay referral fees for traffic.

A worm that spread around Facebook recently featured a photo of a sparsely dressed woman and offered a link to “see more.” Adi Av, a computer developer in Ashkelon, Israel, encountered the image on the Facebook page of a friend he considered to be a reliable source of amusing Internet content.

A couple of clicks later, the image was posted on Mr. Av’s Facebook profile and sent to the “news feed” of his 350 friends.

“It’s an honest mistake,” he said. “The main embarrassment was from the possibility of other people getting into the same trouble from my profile page.”

Others confess to experiencing a more serious discomfiture.

“You feel like a total idiot,” said Jodi Chapman, who last month unwisely clicked on a Twitter message from a fellow vegan, suggesting that she take an online intelligence test.

Ms. Chapman, who sells environmentally friendly gifts with her husband, uses her Twitter account to communicate with thousands of her company’s customers. The hijacking “filled me with a sense of panic,” she said. “I was so worried that I had somehow tainted our company name by asking people to check their I.Q. scores.”

Social networking attacks do not spare the experts. Two weeks ago, Lee Rainie, director of the Pew Internet and American Life Project, a nonprofit research group, accidentally sent messages to dozens of his Twitter followers with a link and the line, “Hi, is this you? LOL.” He said a few people actually clicked.

“I’m worried that people will think I communicate this way,” Mr. Rainie said. “ ‘LOL,’ as my children would tell you, is not the style that I want to engage the world with.”

Originally printed in the New York Times. Click here for full article.

Source: Pew Internet and American Life Research

isoPeople who use modern information and communication technologies have larger and more diverse social networks, according to new national survey findings that for the first time explore how people use the internet and mobile phones to interact with key family and friends.

These new finding challenge fears that use of new technologies has contributed to a long-term increase in social isolation in the United States.

The new findings show that, on average, the size of people’s discussion networks–those with whom people discuss important matters–is 12% larger amongst mobile phone users, 9% larger for those who share photos online, and 9% bigger for those who use instant messaging. The diversity of people’s core networks–their closest and most significant confidants–tends to be 25% larger for mobile phone users, 15% larger for basic internet users, and even larger for frequent internet users, those who use instant messaging, and those who share digital photos online.

“All the evidence points in one direction,” said Prof. Keith Hampton, lead author of the report. “People’s social worlds are enhanced by new communication technologies. It is a mistake to believe that internet use and mobile phones plunge people into a spiral of isolation.”

Read the full report. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/18–Social-Isolation-and-New-Technology.aspx

Please leave your comments and thoughts below…

A recent study published by the Pew Internet & American Life Project suggests that the growth in adult use of social networking sites is even more staggering than most think.

A December 2008 tracking survey found that 35% of adults now have some sort of online profile on a social networking site, up from 8% in 2005.

Around 65% of teenagers use social networking sites, but the 35% of adults account for many more users because adults are a much bigger segment of the population than teens.

The percentage of adults aged 18-24 with social networking profiles is 75.

Here is the whole breakdown:

  • 75% of online adults 18-24 have a profile on a social network site
  • 57% of online adults 25-34 have a profile on a social network
  • 30% of online adults 35-44 have one
  • 19% of online 45 to 54 year olds have a profile
  • 10% of online 55 to 64 year olds have a profile
  • 7% of online adults 65 and older have a profile

Adults using social networking sites far prefer Facebook to all other sites.

  • 73% have a Facebook account
  • 48% have a MySpace profile
  • 14% have an account on LinkedIn
  • 1% each are on Yahoo, YouTube, Tagged, Flickr and Classmates.com
  • 10-12% are on “other” sites such as Bebo, Last.FM, Digg, Blackplanet, Orkut, Hi5 and Match.com

Most are still using social networking sites for personal reasons (89%.)

To read the full report, click to:
http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Adults-and-Social-Network-Websites.aspx

Women outnumber men using social networking sites 50% to 42%.

See more about that study here:
http://pewinternet.org/Media-Mentions/2009/Women-Outnumber-Men-on-Social-Networking-Sites.aspx

How do you use social networking sites? Do you see a business use for them? Please leave ANY comments you like in the space below…

(posted on October 14, 2009)

VIDEO

TAG CLOUD

About Me

Enter The Net is the passion of Rob Patton. Rob is a successful internet marketing consultant who combines his passion for helping all businesses succeed on the Web with his love of teaching. In addition to running Enter The Net, Rob is a part time instructor at the Clackamas Small Business Development Center. Rob is a proud member of River City LeTip and the Portland Area Business Association.

Twitter

    Photos